![genogram key social work genogram key social work](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/55e4aa63828f687beb115f049b0cf18507e8447f/4-Figure1-1.png)
There are other ideas but for me the underpinning theme is of thinking about things differently in a non-blame, and non- problem saturated manner, which is in keeping with sound, empowering social work practice. It may not, but that is ok as we try again, we gather more information about the family story developing ideas and hypotheses that may be useful in helping the family change.Ī systemic model is not a panacea but it is a clear structure to supporting families this idea of hypothesising is one approach under the umbrella of systemic family therapy. To offer and discuss a different explanation with a family may be what makes the difference. The hypothesis does not have to be true to be useful it may encourage a different perspective on the problem for the family. It is academic to think about ideas about what may be taking place in a family but to then think about how this idea can be offered to the family is what leads to change. This is critical and for me the most important part of the model. If the idea of culture and tradition was one that stood out, the group would then think about how the hypothesis could be explored in action. The person presenting normally sits out and then feeds back about how they may think the ideas shared fit with their perspective, what hypotheses to explain the dilemma did they like. It also encourages practitioners to think about how they are part of the family system.
![genogram key social work genogram key social work](https://www.free-power-point-templates.com/articles/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Genogram-in-LucidChart.png)
Sharing a hypothesis and thinking about how I came to this encourages me to think about how I may be ‘marrying my idea’. They encourage different perspectives, they encourage the practitioner to think about things differently and the family and problems are repositioned, we all come with our own biases and it is important to unpick those to see how they are influencing the work. The purposes of hypotheses are boundless. The group are encouraged to think about ideas relationally and to adopt a curious position where they think about the whole family system.
![genogram key social work genogram key social work](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/94/c5/1c/94c51cf0a8da9374146502b0769781a4.jpg)
The group would then be asked to generate hypotheses, which could then explain or be linked to the dilemma. If a case remains open to social care we are inevitably ‘stuck’ if we weren’t stuck the case would be closed. Positive changeĭilemmas are based on the principle that we are working to create positive change in the family and explore what is stopping this from happening. Once the group has a clear understanding of the family the practitioner would offer a dilemma. The patterns are considered with families where the aim is to not identify a cause but to help families and those around them to make changes themselves by offering ideas or possibilities which offer a difference to established patterns of behaviour.Ī genogram is first shared with the team and group with the allocated worker talking it through, including not only a family tree but any harm, abuse, diagnoses and relational strengths. Systemic family therapy is something I struggle to define on occasion many theories and ideas fall under this umbrella term.Īt its core, problems or difficulties in families are viewed relationally where patterns of behaviour have developed between people. The use of a defined practice models in local authorities is becoming popular, but I question if the adoption of a model is not merely tokenistic but truly the core of facilitating change. The models we use are embedded by family therapists and case consultations, which have links to the Reclaiming Social Work model. I work in a local authority which has adopted a systemic family therapy model to social work practice.